This wiki has had no edits or log actions made within the last 45 days and has been automatically marked as inactive. If you would like to prevent this wiki from being closed, please start showing signs of activity here. If there are no signs of this wiki being used within the next 15 days, this wiki will be closed in accordance to the Komari et. al v. Samarinda Mayor
While the primary argument of this lawsuit focuses on the government’s operation of granting mining licenses that are not following post-mine reclamation procedures and obligations that the government does not enforce, climate change used as a secondary argument. Plaintiff included one of the propositions that proved that the defendant had contributed to climate change in Samarinda.
The plaintiff submitted that under the Mayor’s reign, several climate-related events have occurred, including but not limited to; a) the air temperature increase in the city of Samarinda by 0.04 degrees/year; b) the increasingly large amount of rainfall in the city of Samarinda since 2012; c) the continuous increase of mud floods quantity in the city of Samarinda since 2008; d) the death of 9 children as a result of the mining pool which is not reclaimed.
-Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 138/PDT/2015/PT.SMR